Talk:Roger C. Field

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Industrial design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Second deletion of this obvious vanity page. Seriously, who mentions being in four different 'Whos Who' books? This is kind of sad really.

Marked for deletion; obvious vanity page. The "references" section is amusing.

71.48.166.244 (talk) 17:58, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many names deleted, text revised to better conform and to attempt to negate vanity claim. Reduced amount of references which were placed solely as proof. Will check to see whether this is considered appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.53.112.238 (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Added worthwhile patent for dentistry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.53.115.127 (talk) 09:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There definitely does need to be a fair amount of revision, but where to start? The references are probably the first place. They can not be verified easily... personal letters, etc. I think there is a place here for this mainly because of the foldaxe and other inventions, but I could go either way on a page for the Foldaxe or Fields.Airproofing (talk) 23:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article appears hugely vanity. Most of the information is unsupported per Wiki guidelines and it appears, though can not be substantiated, that the individual is doing their own editing. I agree the Foldaxe is noteworthy, but having patents is not, nor is who one is related to or how many notatble people one knows. As for the guitar, there is nothing except knowing guitarists or getting lessons from famous guitarists. There needs to be major removal of information or renamed Foldaxe. Airproofing (talk) 15:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Major removal of information has been carried out and focus is more on Foldaxe which has been deemed noteworthy. 4 July 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.53.117.12 (talk) 08:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce article now centred around the Foldaxe guitar. The Tap-Picking technique needs to go on youtube. HBC Martin (talk) 09:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did a major clean up and reformatting of references. Also moved items around. Might need another section on Guitar stuff not related to Foldaxe. I think it looks much cleaner and more focused. My opinion only... Foldaxe is quite an invention. Sources are pretty sound for that. Airproofing (talk) 19:07, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Foldaxe

The Foldaxe Guitar.

The Foldaxe is a unique piece of engineering, achieving an elegant design concept and solution, thought to be technically impossible when applied to a stringed musical instrument such as a guitar.

Tone and quality are maintained irrespective of the position of the neck which is folded through 180 degrees allowing it fit into a small carrying case.

While other folding guitars have be made, all of them must be retuned after unpacking. The Foldaxe design supersedes this requirement. It really is quite unique in the world of musical instruments. There is no other like it.

HBC Martin (talk) 10:06, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Roger C. Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]